Hey everyone, as I navigate life and of course, dont go to calsses or school anymore, I will share with you what I do work on or is submitted to me, Otherwise any posts I make will likely be scanned and uploaded images of my works as I find them.
Monday, January 15, 2024
Monday, March 18, 2019
Updates Coming to School Essays and Projects
I have been hard at work and I have been really dedicating much of my time to my real life business. I am currently working on authoring a book and building my business. I want to spend more time to dedicating to this website and uploading some work from the past which will consist of transcribing pen and paper work to digital format. Therefore, I am asking for donations. I hope what you find here is of value and has helped get you through your classes. If you find it in your heart instead of a beer, please donate a few dollars to me using paypal and soon, patreon, to help give me more incentive and time to be able to chase down my dream of writing for passion.
Thank you
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
How to Write a Financial Statement Analysis.
I can't post the entire paper because of the integrated tables and graphs, but I'm going to include some excerpts from it. If you want the whole thing, please purchase my eBook on how to write a Financial Statement Analysis. In my book, I detail each step needed to be taken, the best free sites to get your financial information from, where and how to calculate industry ratios, and proper formatting for the Ratio Analysis section. It's just a quick guide on what to do and how to do it. You can spend $200 to have one done for you in no time, or you can buy my guide and save $198 dollars and actually do the work yourself in half the time you'd have if you tried to do it yourself.
Believe me, when I first starting working on this it took me at least a week to gather information from several sources just on how to START the Financial Statement Analysis.
Here's portions of the document, with graphs excluded:
..........................
.........................................................
The total asset turnover ratio is the overall way to analyze how Apple is utilizing all of its assets to generate sales. The industry average is 1.1; Apple falls short of the allowed range at 0.86755. To increase sales margins, Apple could benefit from finding ways to utilize more of its assets or cut down on underperforming equipment. In the end, asset management may not be where it should be, but Apple can remedy the problem with minor changes in certain key areas.
............................................................
Click here to get the rest of the paper, with graphs and a guide on how to write a Financial Statement Analysis!
**UPDATE (Feb 2014): Due to the use of a third party company, there will sometime be issues with transactions. If any errors or issues occur, a quick email to me with a brief detail and copy of your receipt, I will Email you the PDF version.**
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Johnny Cash I Walk the Line short essay.
A "Reflection" Paper composed for Business Management
Interview. Bill Zizzi. Southwestern Investment.
George & Jones (2009). Essentials of Contemporary Management (4th Ed.). New York, New York:
McGraw-Hill-Irwin.
Raymond-James Financial Services. 12/7/2010.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Just giving an update.
A story using the character "BeoWulf" in a modern sense.
David Hill
Choppin
Beowulf and the Covenant
It was the beginning of a legendary war, and the Covenant were drawing ever closer to the Pillar of Autumn. The Covenant are a beastly race, descendants of Grendel. They left earth long ago tired of being oppressed, and one day they would again combat the human race.
For hundreds of years, they flew to a far away planet, where their technology increased exponentially double of humans. There, they constructed they’re (life-giver), a ring which could reproduce the conditions of any weather they wanted, controlled from central control rooms throughout it. This ring would spin in the middle of space with the power of centrifugal force, to recreate gravity. This became the Covenant’s home. After a time they were set on fulfilling their (blood-lust). (This is where we will continue with they’re attack on the human race.)
The Covenant were drawing closer still, a loud crash and a tremor was felt by the crew aboard the Pillar of Autumn. The ship was being breached. It was time to release him, the super warrior, Master Chief, the hero of the mankind. As they began to release Master Chief from his cryogenic chamber, something went terribly wrong, an explosion, shots, or a failure in electronics. The cause is still unknown, but one fact is, Master Chief did not survive. Immediately, a distress signal was sent back to earth for someone, something.
He had been in seclusion, for unknown reasons, but as news reached earth of the Covenant’s attack, he knew it was time. Beowulf immediately left on a journey to get to the Pillar of Autumn. He arrived at the closest military base, found a craft, and embarked on his heroic journey. For when the future is in danger, there is no time to hesitate.
As Beowulf arrived at the Pillar of Autumn, the military were still battling and defending against the Covenant. Beowulf grabbed the nearest (boom-stick) along with an assault rifle, he went to work.
Beowulf ran down the corridor, his assault rifle in hand. Turning left into the mess hall, it was time for battle. He took cover next to a fellow soldier behind and over turned table. He turned around on his knees, looked up to see his foes. Once he got a good idea of their positions, he jumped up with a loud cry. The enemy fired upon him with their plasma guns, he dodged, shot back, took cover at a column closer to the enemy. His kill count was at five already. He continued on throughout the Pillar of Autumn. Killing any and all of the Covenant he came across, showing no mercy. He showed no fear and no mercy, the Covenant began to grow tiresome and fearful, they couldn’t find a way to defeat this human. Eventually they had to retreat to their ship; Beowulf was too great a warrior for them to overcome. The Covenant had been defeated for now…
Bibliography
www.bungie.com
Microsoft and Halo
A term paper on Christology.
I wish I could go back with the knowledge I have now and absolutely tear this paper up. By that, I mean I would write a kick-ass paper compared to this.
Christological emphases are based throughout the gospels. Sometimes, however, many questions arise due to dissimilarities among the various writers. These differences can cause questioning among any readers of the bible, even the faithful. Those who expect the Bible as the literal word of God definitely come face to face with this problem. Although these differences do exists, the similarities among the gospels are greater. Therefore, each of the gospels can be used concurrently to strengthen faith, rather than weaken it.
Upon reading the four different synoptic gospel accounts, it becomes blatantly obvious that none of them are exactly the same. Matthew and Mark do seem to be highly similar in the recounting of the death of Jesus. In Matthew and Mark both, before Jesus dies, he “cried in a loud voice ‘My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?’” Whereas in Luke, Jesus also “cried out in a loud voice” but, Instead said “Father, into your hands I commend my spirit!” In John, however, Jesus simply says “It is finished.” Other similarities are seen among Matthew, Mark, and Luke, being the fact that Simon is addressed as being a helper to carry Jesus’ cross; this fact is excluded from John’s account. The temple being torn into two is another difference that is in all three gospels except for Luke. Other dissimilarities include the centurions who witnessed Jesus dying. Matthew and Mark the centurion says “Truly this man was the son of God.” In Luke the Centurion is quoted for saying “This man was innocent beyond doubt.” In John this centurion is never mentioned, but a completely different detail is added in that does not appear in any of the other gospels. John tells us about a soldier who thrust a spear into Jesus’ side and water flowed out. Aside from the obvious similarities, like the fact that Jesus died, Matthew and Mark are very similar, in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John Jesus is crucified with 2 criminals but, the way he is treated by the revolutionaries in each of the gospels are different.
Each of the writers of the gospels places a specific emphasis on a certain event or events in each of the stories. For instance John heavily emphasizes who Jesus appeared to after he was risen and the events of his death were not greatly emphasized. John’s gospel is definitely a high Christology because by Jesus saying “It is finished” shows us that Jesus knew that his purpose was to save the world from sin. Luke’s gospel puts most of his emphasis on the appearance of Jesus on the road to Emmaus, and the disciples. Luke’s gospel is without a doubt of High Christology. Throughout his gospel, Jesus hints to the fact that he is divine. In Luke before Jesus dies, he is talking with the revolutionaries and one asked to be remembered when Jesus arrived in the Kingdom. Jesus replied, “Today you will be with me in Paradise” simply showing that Jesus does know he is divine. In Mark, the main focus is on the Crucifixion of Jesus, Marks Christological emphasis is a suffering Jesus, low Christology, and focusing on the crucifixion helps to emphasize this. Matthew also focuses on the Crucifixion of Jesus, and Matthew’s Christology is also Low Christology, emphasizing the same as Mark.
When reading the Bible, it is often very easy to begin to question faith. It should be kept in mind though, that’s all faith is, faith. Faith is trust in something because you as a person believe it to be true. Although the gospels vary greatly as you read through each one, it should not be cast aside as untrue. Many people take the Bible as the true spoken word of God, or actual factual accounts. If this is the case, then it they can be scarcely judged as key examples to this type of writing. (Fitzmeyer, 9) The most common way to explain the differences in each gospel is the “Q” source, or Quelle. Matthew and Luke both draw from this source whereas mark does not. The differences occur because of other independent sources believed to be had by the individual writers. (Fitzmeyer, 9) The differences among each of the synoptic gospels could prove that they were not written to be factually accurate but for some other reason, faith. The gospels are so different because of each of the sources, and the fact that they were written at different times, in different places, trying to affect different audiences. Christ was a man who did in fact exist. Christ shows up in many non-Biblical texts and manuscripts. Even though some of these are obscure and vague, it still proves that Jesus was real and he was sentenced to death by Pilate. So, the fact that each gospel may vary in details the fact does not change that Jesus died for our sins, thus instead of reading the Bible as the literal word of God, it should be read to strengthen ones faith by studying these differences and coming to know the truth much closer.
The Gospel of John is the story that resonates the most with me because it is seemingly independent from the other 3 gospels. It talks about fulfilling scripture passages and you just get the feel of more of an epic, a greater feel of glory.
The provided painting Crucifixion is by a German Artist Matthias Grunewald. It was an altarpiece dated at 1503. Matthias lived from c1475-1528 (Pioch) and was born in Wurzburg. In 1504 he became a resident of Seligenstadt where he worked and completed most of his paintings. During his lifetime he was a court painter for an Archbishop until 1514, and then after the Thirty Years War began, he became the court painter for Albrecht von Brandenburg. He married in 1519 and had a son named Andreas, whom he later apprenticed to Arnold Rucker. In 1528 Grunewald died in Saxony. (Dictionary of World Biography: The Renaissance) This painting, Crucifixion, by Grunewald uses various symbols and effects. First the lighting on Jesus and the angle of all surrounding figures gives a sense of rising. The lamb with the cross is obviously the Lamb of God, who died for our sins. The suffering of Jesus and the lamenting characters represent the human nature of Christ, only to be contrasted by the lamb and the lighting which give allusion to the divine Christ.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Bible
Dictionary of World Biography: The Renaissance, Salem Press 1999
July 27, 2002 Nicolas Pioch (http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/grunewald/)
An Essay on Duke Wellington
I got a horrible grade on this so I don't recommend using this.
David Hill
Duke Wellington Essay
Wellington is among the top military leaders of history, he made a name for himself when he defeated a much larger force than his, in India. Among other battles, such as Salamanka and Waterloo, this led to his success, Wellington’s ideology of war helped evolve the classical sense of warfare to the cautious affair it is today.
In school, Wellington did not excel as a student; he was at the lower end of his class. Family matters for Wellington were not much greater, his brothers did very well causing his mother to be disappointed in him; with lost hope, she sent him to serve in the army. The early life of Wellington had the most profound effect on him as a general; it prepared him to be the perfect general for the changing style of warfare. Being conservative was what made Wellington great. His clarity of mind and energy made him a hero. He would ride all over the battlefield, checking on the situation, and figuring out what he had to do next. Orders were written in perfect form amidst heavy gunfire and commotion. All of this lets us into the mind of Wellington, he knows that Rash decisions are bad. Unlike the time of Alexander when glory was the only thing that mattered, the way Wellington was raised and who he was prepared him to be a great general in the changing definition of war.
Every day, Wellington followed a specific routine of shaving, eating, and other daily activities. He hardly slept, when he would go to bed, he would fall instantly asleep and slept for 6 or less hours every night. He was meticulous, the scale on which he was fighting had changed, and much larger than Alexander’s; yet, no advances in communications technology had been seen. On top of that, you cannot be Alexander the Great with this new scale of battle. Wellington was not grandiose, he would dress in ordinary civilian clothes, he did not elevate himself as Alexander or Napoleon did. Even though Wellington had contempt for his soldiers calling them “scum of the earth” he was still personal with nice to them and personal with them. He had to be, Wellington had so much to command over with his alliances. This meant Wellington had to me more cautious and he was already this.
It is possible to think that Wellington was not brave, because he had to stay near the back or because he doesn’t fight as much as the typical soldier. This is untrue due to the scale, Wellington would need to stay near the back so he could see what was going on, so he could give orders and direction to his troops. Although he doesn’t get involved directly in the action as much, he is still closely involved in battle. In one instance a cannonball flew straight under Copenhagen’s neck. Wellington was brave, brave with responsibility. Warfare was now more about country versus country, where the people were supportive of the cause. The scale had changed so much that Wellington knew he was needed to win. Throwing his life away for glory would be foolhardy.
Something I had to write for who knows why.
Another essay from senior year. Obviously, I had horrible writing then.
David Hill
Mr. Peper
Theology 12
8-19-2007
Honi the Circle-Drawer
"Once they said to Honi the Circle-Drawer, 'Pray that rain may fall,' He said to them, 'Go out and bring in the Passover ovens that they may not be softened.' He prayed, but rain did not come down. What did he do? He drew a circle and stood within it and said, 'Lord of the universe, Your sons have turned their faces to me, for I am as a son of the house before You. I swear by Your great name that I will not move from here until You have mercy on Your sons.' Rain began dripping. He said, 'Not for this have I prayed, but for rain (that fills) cisterns, pits, and caverns.' It began to come down violently. He said, 'Not for this have I prayed, but for rain of goodwill, blessing, and plenty.' It came down in moderation until Israel went up from Jerusalem to the Mount of the House because of the rain." That’s a paragraph from the Mishnah, it is also the most common story of Honi and what he is pretty much famous for. (http://www.christian-thinktank.com/mq4.html)
Onias is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Honi. As read above, all Onias did was pray to God for rain, and he got it. Oh, and he drew a circle in the ground and told God he wasn’t going to move until it rained. Josephus, a skeptic of miracle workers, regarded Onias as a “righteous man” and “beloved of God.” (http://members.aol.com/FLJOSEPHUS/HoniTheCircleDrawer.htm)
In Honi’s time he was considered a miracle worker, but he shouldn’t be grouped with Jesus for that fact alone. Honi was called “Son of the House” which means literally “Closeness to God.” John Dominic Crossan (how ironic that he appeared!) is said to have argued that Onias, by drawing circles, was simply performing magic. But, Josephus was adamant that he was a righteous man, who prayed to God and got results. (http://www2.ida.net/graphics/shirtail/honithe.htm)
Glenn Miller December 5, 2001 http://www.christian-thinktank.com/mq4.html
G.J. Goldberg http://members.aol.com/FLJOSEPHUS/HoniTheCircleDrawer.htm
Kerry A. Shirts http://www2.ida.net/graphics/shirtail/honithe.htm
This is a horrible attempt at a book report Senior Year.
Taking it back a little old school. This is from My senior year in High School. This was a poor attempt at a book report about Thomas Merton's book.
David Hill
Mr. Peper
Theology 12
8-28-07
Merton Book Report
In his statement, Merton is trying to say that the Bible is not just a book to be read – “it is beyond literature.” When he states it is “beyond religion” he means that no religion out there can tell you exactly what it means, the reader has to read it for themselves and interpret it and apply meaning to their own life. He reaffirms the previous point – “beyond the devout” and when he says “the cleansing awe of initiation into ritual and mystery” he means that there’s more to it than all the traditions we get from the Bible. “Beyond the healing and transforming sense of self-transcendence” means there’s more to it than reading it for spiritual comfort. The Bible is full of contradictions.
Merton view on reading scripture is that when reading the Bible, one will be faced with contradictions to one’s faith and the fact that it’s hard for non-believers and even more so for believers. I Agree with Merton because the Bible is full of some of the most controversial topics. Also since the Bible is written by so many different authors, how can it all be brought together in one? It’s also true that when you read the Bible it’s hard to make sense of it all which leads to confusion and misunderstanding.